Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tanaya's avatar

This is a life-saver, THANK YOU

Expand full comment
Ben Boehlert's avatar

As someone who has varying expertise across fields, I wonder if a good addition would be possible criticisms from a skeptical reader. When I'm reading journal articles, I often wish I could know possible criticisms an expert would have. What robustness checks are they missing? What are confounders based on the previous literature that I might not think of? Essentially, what would the comment after its presentation at a conference look like? This might work better for working papers than Econometrica ones.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts